AS & A-Level Chemistry 03 — Bonding, shape and states of matter
PublicIndependent Deckloop AS Chemistry study material aligned with Cambridge International 9701 (2025–2027). Deck 3 of 18: Bonding, shape and states of matter. Original explanations, worked applications and practice. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Cambridge International Education.
Chemistry
EN
A-Level
83 cards
Study this deck on Deckloop
Preview Cards
A sample of cards from this deck.
Example Explainer
A sample of the AI explainer you can generate for cards in this deck.
Predicting Bond Type Using Electronegativity
The Pauling electronegativity scale assigns dimensionless numerical values to elements to quantify their electron-attracting power. By examining the absolute difference in Pauling electronegativity values between two bonded atoms, chemists can predict the fundamental nature of the bond formed. When two identical atoms bond, such as in , the electronegativity difference is zero, resulting in a purely non-polar covalent bond where the bonding electrons are shared equally. If the two non-metal atoms have a small to moderate difference in electronegativity, they form a polar covalent bond. In this scenario, the shared electron pair is drawn closer to the more electronegative atom, creating partial electrical charges (dipoles).
However, if the electronegativity difference is very large—typically observed when an s-block metal bonds with a highly electronegative non-metal—the bonding is considered ionic. In such cases, the more electronegative atom effectively pulls the bonding electrons entirely into its own valence shell, forming discrete cations and anions that are subsequently held together by electrostatic forces. While the transition from pure covalent to pure ionic bonding is a continuum, calculating the difference in Pauling values provides a reliable, predictive tool for classifying the primary bonding character in binary compounds.
However, if the electronegativity difference is very large—typically observed when an s-block metal bonds with a highly electronegative non-metal—the bonding is considered ionic. In such cases, the more electronegative atom effectively pulls the bonding electrons entirely into its own valence shell, forming discrete cations and anions that are subsequently held together by electrostatic forces. While the transition from pure covalent to pure ionic bonding is a continuum, calculating the difference in Pauling values provides a reliable, predictive tool for classifying the primary bonding character in binary compounds.
Key points
- The Pauling scale provides numerical values representing the electronegativity of elements.
- The difference in electronegativity between two atoms is used to predict their bond type.
- A of zero indicates a non-polar covalent bond with equally shared electrons.
- A small to moderate typically indicates a polar covalent bond.
- A large predicts the formation of an ionic bond due to complete electron transfer.
Worked example
Question
Using the supplied Pauling electronegativity values (: 0.8, : 2.5, : 2.6, : 3.0), deduce whether the bonding in potassium chloride and carbon disulfide is predominantly ionic or covalent.
Solution
1. Calculate the electronegativity difference for : . This large difference predicts an ionic bond.
2. Calculate the electronegativity difference for : . This small difference predicts a covalent bond.
The bonding in is predicted to be ionic, and the bonding in is predicted to be covalent.
2. Calculate the electronegativity difference for : . This small difference predicts a covalent bond.
The bonding in is predicted to be ionic, and the bonding in is predicted to be covalent.
Common pitfalls
- Believing all bonds involving a metal are completely ionic without checking the values. Correct reasoning: If the electronegativity difference between the metal and non-metal is relatively small, the bond may possess significant covalent character, though large differences firmly predict ionic bonding.
- Adding Pauling values rather than subtracting them to determine bond type. Correct reasoning: The absolute difference indicates the inequality in electron sharing, so subtraction is essential.
Prerequisites
- Study Atomic structure and electron arrangement first.
- Study Moles, formulas and chemical calculations first.